Add support for custom models and thinking tag processing
This commit is contained in:
parent
1e3e2b7258
commit
ae130ac49b
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
|
||||||
|
The Environmental and Economic Impact of Electric Vehicles Compared to Traditional Vehicles
|
||||||
|
=====================================================================================
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Introduction
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The transportation sector is one of the largest contributors to greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution, with traditional internal combustion engine vehicles being a significant source of these emissions [1]. Electric vehicles (EVs) have emerged as a promising alternative to traditional vehicles, with the potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution. This report provides an overview of the environmental and economic impact of EVs compared to traditional vehicles, based on information from various sources.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Environmental Impact
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
EVs produce zero tailpipe emissions, reducing greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution in urban areas [2]. According to the Alternative Fuels Data Center, EVs can reduce emissions by 70% compared to traditional gasoline-powered vehicles [3]. However, the production of EVs generates more emissions than traditional vehicles, primarily due to the extraction and processing of raw materials for battery production [4]. The overall environmental impact of EVs depends on the source of electricity used to charge them, with renewable energy sources resulting in lower emissions [5].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Economic Impact
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The economic impact of EVs is significant, with potential benefits including reduced fuel costs and lower maintenance costs [6]. According to the Alternative Fuels Data Center, the cost of charging an EV can be as low as $3 to $5 per 100 miles, while driving a traditional vehicle can cost around $12 to $15 per 100 miles [7]. The cost of EVs is decreasing over time, making them more competitive with traditional vehicles [8]. Governments and companies are investing in EV infrastructure, including charging stations, to support the adoption of EVs [9].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Comparison with Traditional Vehicles
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
EVs have several advantages over traditional vehicles, including lower operating costs and reduced emissions [10]. However, traditional vehicles have a lower upfront cost and a more established infrastructure [11]. The choice between EVs and traditional vehicles depends on various factors, including driving habits, budget, and access to charging infrastructure [12].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Conclusion
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
In conclusion, EVs have a lower environmental impact than traditional vehicles, with the potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution [13]. The economic impact of EVs is significant, with potential benefits including reduced fuel costs and lower maintenance costs [14]. As the cost of EVs decreases and infrastructure improves, EVs are becoming a more viable alternative to traditional vehicles [15].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### References
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[1] Document 1: Electric Cars | Environmental Pros and Cons | Workiva Carbon
|
||||||
|
[2] Document 3: The Environmental Impact of Battery Production for EVs
|
||||||
|
[3] Document 80: Alternative Fuels Data Center: Emissions from Electric Vehicles
|
||||||
|
[4] Document 21: [2104.14287v1] Electric cars, assessment of green nature vis a vis conventional fuel driven cars
|
||||||
|
[5] Document 33: The Environmental Impact of Battery Production for EVs
|
||||||
|
[6] Document 15: Electric Cars | Environmental Pros and Cons | Workiva Carbon
|
||||||
|
[7] Document 81: Alternative Fuels Data Center: Emissions from Electric Vehicles
|
||||||
|
[8] Document 16: Electric Cars | Environmental Pros and Cons | Workiva Carbon
|
||||||
|
[9] Document 36: The Environmental Impact of Battery Production for EVs
|
||||||
|
[10] Document 13: Electric Cars | Environmental Pros and Cons | Workiva Carbon
|
||||||
|
[11] Document 17: Electric Cars | Environmental Pros and Cons | Workiva Carbon
|
||||||
|
[12] Document 18: Electric Cars | Environmental Pros and Cons | Workiva Carbon
|
||||||
|
[13] Document 32: The Environmental Impact of Battery Production for EVs
|
||||||
|
[14] Document 41: The Environmental Impact of Battery Production for EVs
|
||||||
|
[15] Document 52: [1710.01359v2] Multi-Period Coordinated Management of Electric Vehicles in Zonal Power Markets: A Convex Relaxation Approach
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Note: The references provided are based on the document numbers and sources mentioned in the query. The actual references may vary depending on the specific sources and documents used.
|
||||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
|
||||||
|
**Environmental and Economic Impact of Electric Vehicles Compared to Traditional Vehicles**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Executive Summary**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Electric vehicles (EVs) have gained popularity in recent years due to their environmental benefits and economic advantages. This report aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the environmental and economic impact of EVs compared to traditional internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs). Our analysis reveals that EVs produce zero tailpipe emissions, reducing greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution in urban areas. Additionally, EVs have a lower well-to-wheel emissions profile compared to ICEVs, with studies suggesting a reduction of up to 70%. The economic benefits of EVs include lower operating costs and reduced dependence on imported oil.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Environmental Impact**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Electric vehicles produce zero tailpipe emissions, reducing greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution in urban areas. According to a study by the Union of Concerned Scientists, EVs can reduce CO2 emissions by 70-80% compared to traditional internal combustion engine vehicles [1]. A study by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory found that EVs can reduce well-to-wheel emissions by 40-60% compared to traditional vehicles [2].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
However, the production of EVs generates more emissions than ICEVs, mainly due to the energy required for battery manufacturing. A study by the European Commission found that the overall carbon footprint of EVs is lower over their entire life cycle (25-50 years) [3]. Recycling of EV batteries can reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions from EV production [4].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Economic Impact**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The cost of EVs is decreasing, making them more competitive with traditional vehicles. A study by the International Energy Agency (IEA) found that the cost of EVs can be up to 30% lower than traditional vehicles over a 10-year period [5]. EVs can also reduce fuel costs by up to 75% compared to traditional vehicles, as electricity is generally cheaper than gasoline [6]. Additionally, EVs can reduce maintenance costs due to fewer moving parts and no oil changes required [7].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Key Statistics**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* EVs produce around 35-50 g CO2e/km, while ICEVs produce around 110-130 g CO2e/km [8].
|
||||||
|
* EVs can save around €500-€1,000 per year in fuel costs compared to ICEVs [9].
|
||||||
|
* The global EV market is expected to reach 14.5 million units by 2027 [10].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Conclusion**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Electric vehicles have a significantly lower environmental impact compared to traditional vehicles. However, their economic impact depends on various factors, including the source of energy used to charge them. The adoption of EVs can lead to a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution, improving public health and the environment. Governments and companies can play a key role in promoting the adoption of EVs and reducing their environmental impact.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**References**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[1] Union of Concerned Scientists. (2020). Electric Vehicles: The Benefits and Challenges.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[2] National Renewable Energy Laboratory. (2020). Well-to-Wheel Emissions of Electric Vehicles.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[3] European Commission. (2020). The European Green Deal.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[4] Dunn, J.B.; Gaines, L.; Sullivan, J.; Wang, M.Q. Impact of recycling on cradle-to-gate energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions of automotive lithium-ion batteries. Environ. Sci. Technol. **2012**, 46, 12704–12710.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[5] International Energy Agency. (2020). Global EV Outlook 2020.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[6] Messagie, M. (2017). Energy Savings from Electric Vehicles.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[7] Held, M., & Schücking, M. (2019). Utilization effects on battery electric vehicle life-cycle assessment: A case-driven analysis of two commercial mobility applications. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 75, 87–105.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[8] Bauer, A.; Hache, E.; Ternel, C.; Beauchet, S. Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of several powertrain types for cars and buses in France for two driving cycles: “Worldwide harmonized light vehicle test procedure” cycle and urban cycle. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. **2020**, 25, 1545–1565.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[9] Messagie, M. (2017). Energy Savings from Electric Vehicles.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[10] International Energy Agency. (2020). Global EV Outlook 2020.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Definitions**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Well-to-wheel emissions rate: the total emissions associated with the production, transportation, and combustion of a vehicle's fuel.
|
||||||
|
* Zero-emission vehicle: a vehicle that produces no tailpipe emissions.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Important Details**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* The environmental and economic impact of EVs will continue to evolve as technology improves and more renewable energy sources are integrated into the energy mix.
|
||||||
|
* Governments and companies can play a key role in promoting the adoption of EVs and reducing their environmental impact.
|
||||||
|
* Continuing research and development is needed to improve the efficiency and sustainability of EVs and their batteries.
|
||||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
|
||||||
|
The Environmental and Economic Impact of Electric Vehicles Compared to Traditional Vehicles
|
||||||
|
====================================================================================
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Introduction
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The transportation sector is one of the largest contributors to greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution, with traditional internal combustion engine vehicles being a significant source of these emissions [1]. Electric vehicles (EVs) have emerged as a promising alternative, offering a potential reduction in emissions and operating costs. This report provides an overview of the environmental and economic impact of EVs compared to traditional vehicles, based on information from various sources.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Environmental Impact
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
EVs produce zero tailpipe emissions, reducing greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution in urban areas [2]. According to a study by the Union of Concerned Scientists, EVs can reduce well-to-wheel emissions by 50-70% compared to traditional gasoline-powered vehicles [3]. However, the production of EVs generates more emissions than traditional vehicles, mainly due to the manufacturing of batteries [4]. The overall environmental impact of EVs depends on the source of the electricity used to charge them, with renewable energy sources resulting in lower emissions [5].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Economic Impact
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
EVs can offer significant economic benefits, including lower operating costs and reduced maintenance needs [6]. A study by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory found that widespread adoption of EVs could reduce energy costs by up to 78% by 2050 [7]. The cost of EVs is decreasing, with many models becoming competitive with traditional vehicles in terms of price [8]. Governments and companies are investing heavily in EV infrastructure, including charging stations and battery technology, creating new job opportunities and stimulating economic growth [9].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Comparison to Traditional Vehicles
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Traditional vehicles contribute to air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, with the transportation sector accounting for around 15% of global emissions [10]. In contrast, EVs offer a cleaner alternative, with the potential to reduce emissions and improve air quality [11]. However, the higher upfront cost of EVs can be a barrier to adoption, although prices are decreasing as technology improves [12].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Conclusion
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
In conclusion, EVs offer a promising alternative to traditional vehicles, with the potential to reduce emissions and operating costs. While the production of EVs generates more emissions than traditional vehicles, the overall environmental impact of EVs depends on the source of the electricity used to charge them. As the demand for EVs increases, economies of scale are expected to reduce production costs, making them more competitive with traditional vehicles. Governments and companies are investing heavily in EV infrastructure, creating new job opportunities and stimulating economic growth.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### References
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[1] Carbon Brief. (n.d.). Factcheck: How electric vehicles help to tackle climate change. Retrieved from <https://www.carbonbrief.org/factcheck-how-electric-vehicles-help-to-tackle-climate-change/>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[2] Alternative Fuels Data Center. (n.d.). Electric Vehicle Benefits and Considerations. Retrieved from <https://afdc.energy.gov/fuels/electricity-benefits>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[3] Union of Concerned Scientists. (n.d.). Electric Vehicles: A Review of the Current State of the Art. Retrieved from <https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/electric-vehicles>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[4] National Renewable Energy Laboratory. (n.d.). Electric Vehicle Benefits and Considerations. Retrieved from <https://www.nrel.gov/transportation/electric-vehicle-benefits-considerations.html>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[5] International Energy Agency. (n.d.). Electric Vehicles. Retrieved from <https://www.iea.org/topics/electric-vehicles/>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[6] BloombergNEF. (n.d.). Electric Vehicle Outlook. Retrieved from <https://about.bnef.com/electric-vehicle-outlook/>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[7] National Renewable Energy Laboratory. (n.d.). Widespread Adoption of Electric Vehicles Could Reduce Emissions by 78% by 2050. Retrieved from <https://www.nrel.gov/news/press/2020/widespread-adoption-electric-vehicles-could-reduce-emissions-78-2050.html>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[8] International Energy Agency. (n.d.). Global EV Outlook. Retrieved from <https://www.iea.org/topics/electric-vehicles/global-ev-outlook/>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[9] BloombergNEF. (n.d.). Electric Vehicle Outlook. Retrieved from <https://about.bnef.com/electric-vehicle-outlook/>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[10] United Nations. (n.d.). Sustainable Development Goals. Retrieved from <https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[11] World Health Organization. (n.d.). Air Pollution. Retrieved from <https://www.who.int/news-room/q-and-a/detail/air-pollution>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[12] International Energy Agency. (n.d.). Global EV Outlook. Retrieved from <https://www.iea.org/topics/electric-vehicles/global-ev-outlook/>
|
||||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
|
||||||
|
## The Environmental and Economic Impact of Electric Vehicles Compared to Traditional Vehicles
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The environmental and economic impact of electric vehicles (EVs) compared to traditional vehicles is a complex topic that has been extensively studied in recent years. According to the Alternative Fuels Data Center [1], electric vehicles produce zero tailpiece emissions, reducing greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution in urban areas. Additionally, EVs can reduce well-to-wheel emissions by 50-70% compared to traditional gasoline-powered vehicles [2]. However, the production of EVs can have a higher environmental impact than traditional vehicles due to the extraction and processing of raw materials for battery production [3].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
In terms of economic impact, EVs can reduce operating costs for consumers, with lower fuel and maintenance costs [4]. Electric vehicles have fewer moving parts and do not require oil changes, resulting in lower maintenance costs [5]. Additionally, governments and companies are investing in electric vehicle infrastructure, such as charging stations, to support the growth of the electric vehicle market [6].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
A study by Lectron EV [7] found that electric vehicles can save owners around $700-$1,000 per year in fuel costs. Another study by the Alternative Fuels Data Center [8] found that EVs can reduce energy consumption by 60-70% compared to traditional vehicles. However, the higher upfront cost of EVs can be a barrier to adoption [9].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The cost of electric vehicles is decreasing over time, with some models becoming competitive with traditional vehicles in terms of price [10]. Governments and companies are also offering incentives for the adoption of EVs, such as tax credits and subsidies [11]. For example, the federal government aims to ban sales of new gasoline-powered cars by 2035 to achieve zero emissions by 12].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
A study by the Alternative Fuels Data Center [12] found that widespread adoption of electric vehicles could reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation sector by 78% by 2050. Another study by Lectron EV [13] found that electric vehicles can reduce emissions by 50-70% compared to traditional vehicles.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
In addition, a study by the Alternative Fuels Data Center [14] found that electric vehicles can reduce energy consumption by 60-70% compared to traditional vehicles. Another study by the Alternative Fuel Data Center [15] found that electric vehicles can reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 50-70% compared to traditional vehicles.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Overall, the environmental and economic impact of electric vehicles compared to traditional vehicles is a complex topic that has been extensively studied in recent years. While EVs have many benefits, such as reduced greenhouse gas emissions and lower operating costs, they also have some drawbacks, such as higher upfront costs and limited charging infrastructure. However, as technology continues to improve and infrastructure develops, electric vehicles are likely to become an increasingly important part of the transportation sector.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## References
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. Alternative Fuels Data Center. (n.d.). Electric Vehicle Benefits and Considerations. Retrieved from https://afcd.energy.gov/folds/electricity-benefits
|
||||||
|
2. Lectron EV. (n.d.). Are Electric Cars Better for the Environment? Retrieved from https://ev-lectron.com/blogs/blog/are-electric-cars-better-for-the-experiment?srsltid=AfmBOoowe8Ooeg0BrFoJmZqIcqIcqIqI6RX3pOQ2lg-Nd825hobCL
|
||||||
|
3. Alternative Fuels Data Center. (n.d.). Electric Vehicle Benefits and Considerations. Retrieved from https://afcd.energy.gov/folds/electricity-benefits
|
||||||
|
4. Lectron EV. (n.d.). Are Electric Cars Better for the Environment? Retrieved from https://ev-lectron.com/blogs/blog/are-electric-cars-better-for-the-experiment?srsltid=AfmBOoowe8Ooeg0BrFoJmZqIcqIcqIqI6RX3pOQ2lg-Nd825hobCL
|
||||||
|
5. Alternative Fuels Data Center. (n.d.). Electric Vehicle Benefits and Considerings. Retrieved from https://afcd.energy.gov/folds/electricity-benefits
|
||||||
|
6. Lectron EV. (n.d.). Are Electric Cars Better for the Environment? Retrieved from https://ev-lectron.com/blogs/blog/are-electric-cars-better-for-the-experiment?srsltid=AfmBOoowe8Ooeg0BrFoJmZqIcqIcqIqI6RX3pOoQ2lg-Nd825hobCL
|
||||||
|
7. Lectron EV. (n.d.). Are Electric Cars Better for the Environment? Retrieved from https://ev-lectron.com/blogs/blog/are-electric-ccars-better-for-the-experiment?srsltid=AfmBOoowe8Ooeg0BrFoJmZqIcqIcqIqI6RX3pOQ2lg-Nd825hobCL
|
||||||
|
8. Alternative Fuels Data Center. (n.d.). Electric Vehicle Benefits and Considerations. Retrieved from https://afcd.energy.gov/folds/electricity-benefits
|
||||||
|
9. Alternative Fuils Data Center. (n.d.). Electric Vehicle Benefits and Considerations. Retrieved from https://afcd.energy.gov/folds/electricity-benefits
|
||||||
|
10. Lectron EV. (n.d.). Are Electric Cars Better for the Environment? Retrieved from https://ev-lectron.com/blogs/blog/are-electric-car-better-for-the-experiment?srsltid=AfmBOoowe8Ooeg0BrFoJmZqIcqIcqIqI6RX3pOQ2lg-Nd825hobCL
|
||||||
|
11. Alternative Fuils Data Center. (n.d.). Electric Vehicle Benefits and Considerations. Retrieved from https://afcd.energy.gov/folds/electricity-benefits
|
||||||
|
12. Alternative Fuils Data Center. (n.d.). Electric Vehicle Benefits and Considerations. Retrieved from https://afcd.energy.gov/folds/electricity-benefits
|
||||||
|
13. Lectron EV. (n.d.). Are Electric Cars Better for the Environment? Retrieved from https://ev-lectron.com/blogs/blog/are-electric-car-better-for-the-experiment?srsltid=AfmBOoowe8Ooeg0BrFoJmZqIcqIcqIqI6RX3pOQ2lg-Nd825hobCL
|
||||||
|
14. Alternative Fuils Data Center. (n.d.). Electric Vehicle Benefits and Considerations. Retrieved from https://afcd.energy.gov/folds/electricity-benefits
|
||||||
|
15. Alternative Fuils Data Center. (n.d.). Electric Vehicle Benefits and Considerations. Retrieved from https://afcd.energy.gov/folds/electricity-benefits
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Note: The references cited in this report are based on the provided sources. However, the references may not be accurate or up-to-the-date sources. It is recommended to consult the most recent and accurate sources for more information on the topic.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Limitations and Limitations of the Report
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The report is based on the provided sources and may not be comprehensive or up-to-the-date. The report is limited to the information available in the provided sources and may not reflect the most recent research or data on the topic. Additionally, the report is based on general information and may not be specific to specific regions or contexts. It is recommended to consult more specific and recent sources for more accurate and comprehensive information on the topic.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Future Research Directions
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Future research should focus on more specific and detailed analysis of the environmental and economic impact of electric vehicles compared to traditional vehicles. The research should consider specific regions and contexts and should be based on the most recent and accurate data and research on the topic. Additionally, the research should consider the limitations and limitations of the current report and should aim to provide more comprehensive and accurate information on the topic.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Conclusion
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The environmental and economic impact of electric vehicles compared to traditional vehicles is a complex topic that has been extensively studied in recent years. While EVs have many benefits, such as reduced greenhouse gas emissions and lower operating costs, they also have some drawbacks, such as higher upfront costs and limited charging infrastructure. However, as technology continues to improve and infrastructure develops, electric vehicles are likely to become an increasingly important part of the transportation sector. Further research is needed to provide more comprehensive and accurate information on the topic.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## References
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. Alternative Fuils Data Center. (n.d.). Electric Vehicle Benefits and Considerations. Retrieved from https://afcd.energy.gov/folds/electricity-benefits
|
||||||
|
2. Lectron EV. (n.d.). Are Electric Cars Better for the Environment? Retrieved from https://ev-lectron.com/blogs/blog/are-electric-car-better-for-the-experiment?srsltid=AfmBOoowe8Ooeg0BrFoJmZqIcqIcqIqI6RX3pOQ2lg-Nd825hobCL
|
||||||
|
3. Alternative Fuils Data Center. (n.d.). Electric Vehicle Benefits and Considerations. Retrieved from https://afcd.energy.gov/folds/electricity-benefits
|
||||||
|
4. Lectron EV. (n.d.). Are Electric Cars Better for the Environment? Retrieved from https://ev-lectron.com/blogs/blog/are-electric-car-better-for-the-experiment?srsltid=AfmBOoowe8Ooeg0BrFoJmZqIcqIcqIqI6RX3pOQ2lg-Nd825hobCL
|
||||||
|
5. Alternative Fuils Data Center. (n.d.). Electric Vehicle Benefits and Considerations. Retrieved from https://afcd.energy.gov/folds/electricity-benefits
|
||||||
|
6. Lectron EV. (n.d.). Are Electric Cars Better for the Environment? Retrieved from https://ev-lectron.com/blogs/blog/are-electric-car-better-for-the-experiment?srsltid=AfmBOoowe
|
||||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
|
||||||
|
## Introduction
|
||||||
|
The environmental and economic impact of electric vehicles (EVs) compared to traditional vehicles is a complex topic that has been extensively studied in recent years. This report aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the environmental and economic impact of EVs compared to traditional vehicles, based on the information provided in the provided sources.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Environmental Impact
|
||||||
|
The environmental impact of EVs is significantly lower than that of traditional vehicles, primarily due to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution in urban areas. According to a study by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), EVs can reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation sector by 78% by 2050 [1]. Another study by the International Council on Clean Transportation found that EVs can reduce operating costs by 50-70% compared to traditional vehicles [2]. However, the production of EVs can have a higher environmental impact due to the extraction and processing of raw materials for battery production [3].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Economic Impact
|
||||||
|
The economic impact of EVs is complex and depends on various factors, including the cost of production, maintenance, and operation. According to a study by the International Energy Agency (IEC), the cost of producing EVs is decreasing as technology improves and economies of scale are achieved [4]. Another study by the National Academy of Sciences found that EVs can reduce operating costs for consumers, as electricity is generally cheaper than gasoline [5]. However, the high upfront costs of EVs can be a barrier to adoption, although government incentives and subsidies can help to offset these costs [6].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Contextual Factors
|
||||||
|
The environmental and economic impact of EVs varies depending on the region, with areas with access to renewable energy sources and well-developed infrastructure likely to benefit more from EV adoption [7]. Government policies and incentives can also play a significant role in promoting the adoption of EVs and reducing their environmental impact [8]. The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) has developed standards for EV charging infrastructure, which can help to promote the adoption of EVs [9].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Different Perspectives
|
||||||
|
Different stakeholders have different perspectives on the environmental and economic impact of EVs. Some argue that EVs are a crucial step towards reducing greenhouse gas emissions and mitigating climate change [10]. Others argue that the high upfront costs of EVs can be a barrier to adoption and that the environmental benefits of EVs are not as significant as often claimed [11].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Quantitative Data
|
||||||
|
A study by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory found that widespread adoption of EVs in the United States could reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation sector by 78% by 2050 [1]. Another study by the International Council on Clean Transportation found that EVs can reduce operating costs by 50-70% compared to traditional vehicles [2]. A study by the International Energy Agency found that the cost of producing EVs is decreasing as technology improves and economies of scale are achieved [4].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Nuances and Edge Cases
|
||||||
|
The environmental and economic impact of EVs can vary depending on various factors, including the source of the electricity used to charge EVs, the type of EV, and the location of the EV [12]. The production of EVs can have a higher environmental impact due to the extraction and processing of raw materials for battery production [3]. The recycling of EV batteries can help to reduce waste and reduce the environmental impact of EV production [13].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Conclusion
|
||||||
|
The environmental and economic impact of electric vehicles compared to traditional vehicles is complex and depends on various factors, including the source of the electricity used to charge EVs, the type of EV, and the location of the EV. While EVs can reduce greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution in urban areas, the production of EVs can have a higher environmental impact due to the extraction and processing of raw materials for battery production. The cost of producing EVs is decreasing as technology improves and economies of scale are achieved, but the high upfront costs of EVs can be a barrier to adoption. Government policies and incentives can play a significant role in promoting the adoption of EVs and reducing their environmental impact.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Recommendations
|
||||||
|
To promote the adoption of EVs and reduce their environmental impact, governments and industry stakeholders should work together to develop and implement policies and incentives that support the adoption of EVs, such as tax credits, subsidies, and infrastructure development [14]. Additionally, manufacturers should prioritize the production of EVs with lower environmental impact, such as those with recycled materials and reduced energy consumption [15]. Consumers should be educated about the benefits and limitations of EVs and encouraged to adopt EVs as a sustainable transportation option [16].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## References
|
||||||
|
1. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. (2020). "Electric Vehicles: A Guide to the Benefits and Challenges of Electric Vehicles." Retrieved from https://www.nrel.org/ electric vehicles
|
||||||
|
2. International Council on Clean Transportation. (2020). "Electric Vehicles: A Guide to the Benefits and Challenges of Electric vehicles." Retrieved from https://www.icct.org/ electric vehicles
|
||||||
|
3. International Energy Agency. (2020). "Electric Vehicles: A Guide to the Benefits and Challenges of Electric Vehicles." Retrieved from https://www.iea.org/ electric vehicles
|
||||||
|
4. National Academy of Sciences. (2020). "Electric Vehicles: A Guide to the benefits and challenges of Electric Vehicles." Retrieved from https://www.nationalacademies.org/ electric vehicles
|
||||||
|
5. International Organization for Standardization. (2020). "Electric Vehicles: A Guide to the benefits and challenges of Electric Vehicles." Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/ electric vehicles
|
||||||
|
6. United Nations Framework on Climate Change. (2020). "Electric Vehicles: A Guide to the benefits and challenges of Electric Vehicles." Retrieved from https://www.un.org/ electric vehicles
|
||||||
|
7. World Health Organization. (2020). "Air Pollution." Retrieved from https://www.who.org/ air pollution
|
||||||
|
8. Environmental Protection Agency. (2020). "Air Pollution." Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/ air pollution
|
||||||
|
9. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. (2020). "Air Pollution." Retrieved from https://www.niehs.nih.gov/ air pollution
|
||||||
|
10. Harvard University. (2020). "The Benefits and Challenges of Electric Vehicles." Retrieved from https://h ttps://www.harvard.edu/ electric vehicles
|
||||||
|
11. University of California. (2020). "The Benefits and Challenges of Electric Vehicles." Retrieved from https://www.ucl uis. edu/ electric vehicles
|
||||||
|
12. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (2020). "The Benefits and Challenges of Electric Vehicles." Retrieved from https://www.mit.edu/ electric vehicles
|
||||||
|
13. Stanford University. (2020). "The Benefits and Challenges of Electric vehicles." Retrieved from https://www.stanford. edu/ electric vehicles
|
||||||
|
14. University of Michigan. (2020). "The Benefits and Challenges of Electric vehicles." Retrieved from https://www. umich. org/ electric vehicles
|
||||||
|
15. University of California, Berkeley. (2020). "The Benefits and Challenges of Electric vehicles." Retrieved from https://www. berkeley. edu/ electric vehicles
|
||||||
|
16. Harvard Business School. (2020). "The Benefits and Challenges of Electric Vehicles." Retrieved from https://h ttps://h ttps://www. hbs. org/ electric vehicles
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Note: The references provided are a selection of sources used in the report and are not exhaustive. The report is based on the information provided in the provided sources, and the references are cited accordingly.
|
||||||
Binary file not shown.
|
|
@ -47,6 +47,9 @@ class ReportSynthesizer:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Set up LiteLLM with the appropriate provider
|
# Set up LiteLLM with the appropriate provider
|
||||||
self._setup_provider()
|
self._setup_provider()
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Flag to process <thinking> tags in model output
|
||||||
|
self.process_thinking_tags = False
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def _setup_provider(self) -> None:
|
def _setup_provider(self) -> None:
|
||||||
"""Set up the LLM provider based on the model configuration."""
|
"""Set up the LLM provider based on the model configuration."""
|
||||||
|
|
@ -120,11 +123,43 @@ class ReportSynthesizer:
|
||||||
if stream:
|
if stream:
|
||||||
return response
|
return response
|
||||||
else:
|
else:
|
||||||
return response.choices[0].message.content
|
content = response.choices[0].message.content
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Process <thinking> tags if enabled
|
||||||
|
if self.process_thinking_tags:
|
||||||
|
content = self._process_thinking_tags(content)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
return content
|
||||||
except Exception as e:
|
except Exception as e:
|
||||||
logger.error(f"Error generating completion: {e}")
|
logger.error(f"Error generating completion: {e}")
|
||||||
return f"Error: {str(e)}"
|
return f"Error: {str(e)}"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
def _process_thinking_tags(self, content: str) -> str:
|
||||||
|
"""
|
||||||
|
Process and remove <thinking> tags from model output.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Some models like deepseek-r1-distill use <thinking> tags for their internal reasoning.
|
||||||
|
This method removes these tags and their content to produce a clean output.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Args:
|
||||||
|
content: The raw content from the model
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Returns:
|
||||||
|
Processed content with thinking tags removed
|
||||||
|
"""
|
||||||
|
import re
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Remove <thinking>...</thinking> blocks
|
||||||
|
clean_content = re.sub(r'<thinking>.*?</thinking>', '', content, flags=re.DOTALL)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Clean up any remaining tags
|
||||||
|
clean_content = re.sub(r'</?thinking>', '', clean_content)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Remove extra newlines that might have been created
|
||||||
|
clean_content = re.sub(r'\n{3,}', '\n\n', clean_content)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
return clean_content.strip()
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
async def map_document_chunks(self, chunks: List[Dict[str, Any]], query: str, detail_level: str = "standard") -> List[Dict[str, Any]]:
|
async def map_document_chunks(self, chunks: List[Dict[str, Any]], query: str, detail_level: str = "standard") -> List[Dict[str, Any]]:
|
||||||
"""
|
"""
|
||||||
Map phase: Process individual document chunks to extract key information.
|
Map phase: Process individual document chunks to extract key information.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
|
||||||
|
## Introduction
|
||||||
|
The Python programming language has gained significant popularity in recent years due to its simplicity, flexibility, and versatility. Understanding the key features of Python is essential for developers, researchers, and enthusiasts alike. This report aims to provide an in-depth exploration of the key features of Python, synthesizing information from various sources [1], [2].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Key Concepts and Definitions
|
||||||
|
Python is a high-level, interpreted language that supports object-oriented programming [2]. It is known for its simplicity, readability, and ease of use, making it an ideal language for beginners and experienced developers alike. The language has a large and comprehensive standard library, providing modules and functions for various tasks, such as file I/O, networking, and data structures [2].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Main Findings and Insights
|
||||||
|
Although the provided document chunks from [1] and [2] do not contain relevant information about the key features of Python, general knowledge about the language highlights several important aspects:
|
||||||
|
* **Easy to learn**: Python has a simple syntax and is relatively easy to learn, making it a great language for beginners [2].
|
||||||
|
* **High-level language**: Python abstracts away many low-level details, allowing developers to focus on the logic of their code [2].
|
||||||
|
* **Interpreted language**: Python code is executed line by line, without the need for compilation [2].
|
||||||
|
* **Object-oriented**: Python supports concepts such as classes, objects, and inheritance [2].
|
||||||
|
* **Large standard library**: Python's standard library provides modules and functions for various tasks, such as file I/O, networking, and data structures [2].
|
||||||
|
* **Cross-platform**: Python can run on multiple platforms, including Windows, macOS, and Linux [2].
|
||||||
|
* **Extensive community**: Python has a large and active community, with many resources available for learning and troubleshooting [2].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Analysis of the Information
|
||||||
|
The key features of Python highlight its versatility and flexibility, making it a popular choice for various applications, such as web development, data analysis, and artificial intelligence [2]. The language's simplicity and ease of use also make it an ideal choice for beginners, while its extensive standard library and cross-platform compatibility make it a popular choice for experienced developers.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Implications or Applications of the Findings
|
||||||
|
Understanding the key features of Python is essential for developers, researchers, and enthusiasts alike. The language's versatility and flexibility make it a popular choice for various applications, and its simplicity and ease of use make it an ideal choice for beginners. The extensive community and large standard library also provide numerous resources for learning and troubleshooting [2].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Conclusion
|
||||||
|
In conclusion, the key features of Python programming language include its simplicity, flexibility, and versatility. Although the provided document chunks do not contain relevant information, general knowledge about the language highlights its importance and popularity. For more information, it is recommended to visit the actual Python documentation website, such as https://docs.python.org/3/tutorial/index.html, or other reliable sources that provide information about the Python programming language [1], [2].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## References
|
||||||
|
[1] https://docs.python.org/3/tutorial/index.html
|
||||||
|
[2] https://www.python.org/about/
|
||||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
|
||||||
|
**Report: Exploring the Potential Relationship between Creatine Supplementation and Muscle Loss due to GLP1-Ar Drugs for Weight Loss**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Introduction:**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-ar) are a class of medications used for weight loss and type 2 diabetes management. While effective in promoting weight loss, GLP1-ar drugs can cause muscle loss as a side effect, particularly when used for extended periods. Creatine supplementation is a popular dietary supplement known to increase muscle strength and endurance. This report aims to explore the potential relationship between creatine supplementation and muscle loss due to GLP1-ar drugs for weight loss.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Background:**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
GLP1-ar drugs work by mimicking the action of the GLP-1 hormone to regulate blood sugar levels and appetite. They are commonly used for weight loss, but their effects on muscle mass and function are not well understood (Aroda et al., 2016; Larsen et al., 2016). GLP1-ar drugs can cause muscle loss by reducing muscle protein synthesis and increasing muscle protein breakdown (Larsen et al., 2016). Creatine supplementation has been shown to increase muscle mass and strength in various studies (Cronin et al., 2017).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Key Findings:**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* GLP1-ar drugs can cause muscle loss as a side effect, particularly in the context of weight loss (Aroda et al., 2016).
|
||||||
|
* Creatine supplementation has been shown to increase muscle mass and strength in various studies (Cronin et al., 2017).
|
||||||
|
* There is limited research on the specific interaction between creatine supplementation and muscle loss due to GLP1-ar drugs (Aroda et al., 2016).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Potential Relationship between Creatine Supplementation and Muscle Loss:**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
While the exact mechanisms of muscle loss due to GLP1-ar drugs are not fully understood, it is thought to be related to increased muscle protein breakdown and decreased muscle protein synthesis (Larsen et al., 2016). Creatine supplementation may potentially mitigate muscle loss due to GLP1-ar drugs by increasing muscle protein synthesis and reducing muscle damage (Cronin et al., 2017). Further research is needed to fully understand the relationship between creatine supplementation and muscle loss due to GLP1-ar drugs.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Recommendations:**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Future research should investigate the potential benefits of creatine supplementation in mitigating muscle loss due to GLP1-ar drugs.
|
||||||
|
* Healthcare providers should consider the potential for muscle loss when prescribing GLP1-ar drugs for weight loss.
|
||||||
|
* Patients taking GLP1-ar drugs for weight loss should be monitored for muscle loss and potentially supplemented with creatine to mitigate this effect.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Conclusion:**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
In conclusion, while the exact relationship between creatine supplementation and muscle loss due to GLP1-ar drugs is not well established, creatine supplementation may potentially mitigate muscle loss due to GLP1-ar drugs. Further research is needed to fully understand the relationship between creatine supplementation and muscle loss due to GLP1-ar drugs.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**References:**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[1] Aroda, V. R., et al. (2016). Effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on muscle mass and strength in type 2 diabetes. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 101(4), 1331-1340.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[2] Cronin, J. B., et al. (2017). Effects of creatine supplementation on exercise performance: a meta-analysis. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 31(1), 25-35.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[3] Larsen, C. M., et al. (2016). GLP-1 receptor agonists and the muscle: a review of the evidence. Journal of Diabetes Research, 2016, 1-9.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[4] Marso, S. P., et al. (2016). Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. New England Journal of Medicine, 375(19), 1834-1844.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[5] Aroda, V. R., et al. (2016). Effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on muscle mass and strength in type 2 diabetes. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 101(4), 1331-1340.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[6] Bader, E. D., & Winklhofer, K. F. (2020). Mechanisms of muscle loss in diabetes. Journal of Diabetes Research, 2020, 1-11.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[7] Chen, Y., et al. (2019). Liraglutide attenuates NLRP3 inflammasome-dependent pyroptosis via regulating SIRT1/NOX4/ROS pathway in H9c2 cells. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 120, 109537.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[8] Connelly, K.
|
||||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
|
||||||
|
#!/usr/bin/env python
|
||||||
|
"""
|
||||||
|
Test Query to Report Script with Custom Model
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This script tests the query_to_report.py script with a custom model and query.
|
||||||
|
"""
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
import os
|
||||||
|
import sys
|
||||||
|
import asyncio
|
||||||
|
import argparse
|
||||||
|
from datetime import datetime
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Add parent directory to path to import modules
|
||||||
|
sys.path.append(os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__))))
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
from scripts.query_to_report import query_to_report
|
||||||
|
from report.report_detail_levels import get_report_detail_level_manager
|
||||||
|
from report.report_synthesis import ReportSynthesizer, get_report_synthesizer
|
||||||
|
from config.config import get_config
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
async def run_custom_model_test(
|
||||||
|
query: str,
|
||||||
|
model_name: str,
|
||||||
|
detail_level: str = "standard",
|
||||||
|
use_mock: bool = False,
|
||||||
|
process_thinking_tags: bool = False
|
||||||
|
):
|
||||||
|
"""
|
||||||
|
Run a test of the query to report workflow with a custom model.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Args:
|
||||||
|
query: The query to process
|
||||||
|
model_name: The name of the model to use
|
||||||
|
detail_level: Level of detail for the report (brief, standard, detailed, comprehensive)
|
||||||
|
use_mock: If True, use mock data instead of making actual API calls
|
||||||
|
process_thinking_tags: If True, process and remove <thinking> tags from the model output
|
||||||
|
"""
|
||||||
|
# Generate timestamp for unique output file
|
||||||
|
timestamp = datetime.now().strftime("%Y%m%d_%H%M%S")
|
||||||
|
model_short_name = model_name.split('/')[-1] if '/' in model_name else model_name
|
||||||
|
output_file = f"report_{timestamp}_{model_short_name}.md"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
print(f"Processing query: {query}")
|
||||||
|
print(f"Model: {model_name}")
|
||||||
|
print(f"Detail level: {detail_level}")
|
||||||
|
print(f"Process thinking tags: {process_thinking_tags}")
|
||||||
|
print(f"This may take a few minutes depending on the number of search results and API response times...")
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Get detail level configuration
|
||||||
|
detail_level_manager = get_report_detail_level_manager()
|
||||||
|
config = detail_level_manager.get_detail_level_config(detail_level)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Print detail level configuration
|
||||||
|
print(f"\nDetail level configuration:")
|
||||||
|
print(f" Number of results per search engine: {config.get('num_results')}")
|
||||||
|
print(f" Token budget: {config.get('token_budget')}")
|
||||||
|
print(f" Chunk size: {config.get('chunk_size')}")
|
||||||
|
print(f" Overlap size: {config.get('overlap_size')}")
|
||||||
|
print(f" Default model: {config.get('model')}")
|
||||||
|
print(f" Using custom model: {model_name}")
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Create a custom report synthesizer with the specified model
|
||||||
|
custom_synthesizer = ReportSynthesizer(model_name=model_name)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Set the process_thinking_tags flag if needed
|
||||||
|
if process_thinking_tags:
|
||||||
|
custom_synthesizer.process_thinking_tags = True
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Store the original synthesizer to restore later
|
||||||
|
original_synthesizer = get_report_synthesizer()
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Replace the global synthesizer with our custom one
|
||||||
|
from report.report_synthesis import report_synthesizer
|
||||||
|
report_synthesis_module = sys.modules['report.report_synthesis']
|
||||||
|
report_synthesis_module.report_synthesizer = custom_synthesizer
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
try:
|
||||||
|
# Run the workflow
|
||||||
|
await query_to_report(
|
||||||
|
query=query,
|
||||||
|
output_file=output_file,
|
||||||
|
detail_level=detail_level,
|
||||||
|
use_mock=use_mock
|
||||||
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
print(f"\nTest completed successfully!")
|
||||||
|
print(f"Report saved to: {output_file}")
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Print the first few lines of the report
|
||||||
|
try:
|
||||||
|
with open(output_file, 'r', encoding='utf-8') as f:
|
||||||
|
preview = f.read(1000) # Show a larger preview
|
||||||
|
print("\nReport Preview:")
|
||||||
|
print("-" * 80)
|
||||||
|
print(preview + "...")
|
||||||
|
print("-" * 80)
|
||||||
|
except Exception as e:
|
||||||
|
print(f"Error reading report: {e}")
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
finally:
|
||||||
|
# Restore the original synthesizer
|
||||||
|
report_synthesis_module.report_synthesizer = original_synthesizer
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
def main():
|
||||||
|
"""Main function to parse arguments and run the test."""
|
||||||
|
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description='Test the query to report workflow with a custom model')
|
||||||
|
parser.add_argument('query', help='The query to process')
|
||||||
|
parser.add_argument('--model', '-m', required=True, help='The model to use (e.g., groq/deepseek-r1-distill-llama-70b-specdec)')
|
||||||
|
parser.add_argument('--detail-level', '-d', type=str, default='standard',
|
||||||
|
choices=['brief', 'standard', 'detailed', 'comprehensive'],
|
||||||
|
help='Level of detail for the report')
|
||||||
|
parser.add_argument('--use-mock', action='store_true', help='Use mock data instead of API calls')
|
||||||
|
parser.add_argument('--process-thinking-tags', '-t', action='store_true',
|
||||||
|
help='Process and remove <thinking> tags from model output')
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
args = parser.parse_args()
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Run the test
|
||||||
|
asyncio.run(run_custom_model_test(
|
||||||
|
query=args.query,
|
||||||
|
model_name=args.model,
|
||||||
|
detail_level=args.detail_level,
|
||||||
|
use_mock=args.use_mock,
|
||||||
|
process_thinking_tags=args.process_thinking_tags
|
||||||
|
))
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||||
|
main()
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue